The Affordable Care Act is constitutional.
نویسندگان
چکیده
As this commentary first appeared on www.annals.org, the Supreme Court was hearing arguments in one of the most important social policy cases of the past several decades: the constitutionality of the requirement that individuals obtain minimum health insurance coverage under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The “individual mandate” is the centerpiece of the ACA, and removing it will dramatically diminish the law’s effectiveness. It is also clearly constitutional within the powers of the Constitution’s Commerce Clause. We explain why in this essay, drawing on an amicus brief that we and others filed in the Supreme Court (1). This article reflects our joint view and not necessarily that of the other signatories to that brief.
منابع مشابه
Prevention under the Affordable Care Act (ACA): Has the ACA Overpromised and under Delivered?; Comment on “Interrelation of Preventive Care Benefits and Shared Costs under the Affordable Care Act (ACA)”
This policy brief discusses preventive care benefits and cost-sharing included in health insurance provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislation and highlights some consequences to Americans and the country in terms of healthcare costs and value.
متن کاملInterrelation of Preventive Care Benefits and Shared Costs under the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
With the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), access to insurance and coverage of preventive care services has been expanded. By removing the barrier of shared costs for preventive care, it is expected that an increase in utilization of preventive care services will reduce the cost of chronic diseases. Early detection and treatment is anticipated to be less costly than treatment at ...
متن کاملWhat is the meaning of health? Constitutional implications of defining "medical necessity" and "essential health benefits" under the Affordable Care Act.
متن کامل
"Our own limited role in policing those boundaries": taking small steps on health care.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ignited a political firestorm and raised intriguing new questions of constitutional law. Cutting a path between the liberals and conservatives on the US Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Roberts made small adjustments in established constitutional law to uphold key features of the act. In doing so, he not only upheld the statute but also left the l...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of internal medicine
دوره 156 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012